A book on relationships & communication
The Geometry of Truth is a practical guide for understanding why good people who love each other can still hurt each other, speak past each other, and fail to see what the other person so desperately needs them to see.
"We're in the same room. We're hearing the same words. How are we describing two different realities?"
— the question that wouldn't leave
It started with a scene. Two people who genuinely loved each other. Who were not trying to hurt each other. Who both walked away from the same argument feeling equally wronged — and certain they were right.
That question followed into my friendships, family, the way I read strangers, the way I judged people. And slowly, through reflection and a lot of getting it wrong, a framework emerged.
Most conflicts collapse into "I'm right, you're wrong." But truth has more dimensions than that.
This book names three of them. Not to win the argument — but to finally see the person standing across from you.
The framework
Two people can stand in the same argument and still see something entirely different — not because one of them is lying, but because of where they're standing, what they're carrying, and when it's happening to them. Try each axis below.
Same vantage, different angle — both are seeing the same truth honestly.
i.
The vantage point each person stands on. Same moment, different angles — both real.
ii.
The capacity each person carries, shaped by their wounds, their joys, their history.
iii.
The apology that came too late. The wisdom that arrived before you could hold it.
A romantic partner you keep arguing with without resolution.
A parent or sibling you love but can never quite reach.
A friend whose drift you can feel but can't explain.
Someone you've already lost — and wonder if it had to happen.
I wrote this because I believe that most of the people we lose, we lose unnecessarily — not to betrayal, not to cruelty, but to a gap in language.
This book was extracted — slowly, painfully — from a relationship that ended not because either person stopped caring, but because they couldn't find a way to see what the other person was trying to show them. It's the language that came too late for one relationship, offered early enough to help yours.
— Habeeb
Chapter 8
Examples of constants people declare:
These feel non-negotiable, like core truths about who you are.
But here's one hard question: Are they really constants, or are they just strongly held preferences?
A true constant is something inherent to who you are — something that, if violated, would fundamentally compromise your integrity or well-being.
A value is a preference that can be expressed in different ways.
For instance:
Constant: "I will not be in a relationship where I'm physically harmed." (This is a boundary)
Value: "I want a partner who's ambitious." (Ambition can look many different ways)
The first is a constant. It's a hard line for safety and respect. The second is a value that you've possibly made into a constant without realising it. Maybe what you really value is growth, drive or purpose, and ambition is just one expression of that.
The more constants you have, the less flexible you are. The less flexible you are, the harder it is to find common ground, unlock new sides, adapt to changing circumstances, or be in relationships with other people who have their own constants.
Every constant you declare is a door you close.
"I must make $100k" closes the door to opportunities that might be fulfilling but pay less. "I can only be with someone who cooks" closes the door to a partner who might show love in other ways. "I need to live in a city" closes the door to unexpected life paths.
Now, some constants are worth keeping. But most people have way more constants than they realise, and many of them aren't serving them.
When you make too many things constants, you become brittle. You can't adapt to new situations because you can't bend. You can't unlock new sides because your side is fixed.
This shows up as chronic unhappiness, relationship failure, career stagnation, inability to grow. You think your constants are protecting you, but they're often trapping you.
You meet someone. They're 80% of what you want. But they violate one of your constants.
Your constant: "My partner must love to travel."
Reality: They like to travel but prefer to stay home more than you do.
If you've declared this a constant, you end the relationship or try to change them. Both will fail. The third option — the one you've closed off — is to unlock a new side: travel together a few times a year, take some solo trips, honour both needs. You can't get there if the constant is fixed. Constants don't bend. They break.
Sam runs a small freelance graphic design business. He works sixty-hour weeks, constantly chases unpaid invoices and hasn't taken a real vacation in three years. But he holds tight to his defining constant: "I must be my own boss. I don't answer to anyone."
Then an incredible opportunity comes up — a design agency offers him a Lead Designer role, excellent salary, massive creative control. But he'd have a boss. Sam immediately declines.
Two weeks later, sitting at his kitchen table at midnight drafting a polite email to a nightmare client who refuses to pay a $400 invoice, the hollow feeling of his "freedom" finally hits him. He isn't actually his own boss. His dozens of demanding, low-paying clients are his bosses, and they manage him worse than any creative director would have.
Sam's constant was trapping him. What he truly valued wasn't being his own boss — it was creative autonomy and professional respect. He had turned a value into a rigid structural demand, and rejected a role that offered more of what he actually wanted.
Nadia and Jared have been married for 11 years. Jared handled the finances, the logistics, the planning. Nadia handled the emotional world. It was never a formal arrangement. It was just what happened.
By year seven, resentment had grown roots. Time kept writing the constant: Nadia doesn't need to be asked. Nadia doesn't need to be held. Nadia is the holder.
In year 11, on a Sunday morning, Jared asks her what she wants for dinner, and Nadia calmly says: "I want you to ask me how I am. Not tonight. Every day. I've been drowning for eight years, and you haven't noticed because I'm too good at swimming."
Jared stares at her. From where he stands, nothing has been wrong. She never said anything. And he says the words that time always puts in people's mouths: "Why didn't you say something sooner?"
It's a fair question. It's also the wrong question. Because every day she didn't say it, the implied constant grew stronger. Time was building a wall, one silent day at a time. By the time she had the courage to speak, the wall was so high that her truth sounded like demolition.
Jared isn't a villain. Nadia isn't a martyr. They're two people who let time write a constant neither of them read.
When you look at someone else's behaviour and apply a harsh metric to it, you think you're making a statement about them. But you are actually writing a binding contract for yourself.
By judging a behaviour as "wrong," you draw a line in the sand. Over time, as you build your identity around it, that constraint hardens into a constant. And when you eventually need the grace you denied others, you'll find that your past judgements have solidified into walls you can't climb over.
Watching who you judge isn't just an exercise in kindness towards them — it's an act of preserving freedom for yourself.
The fewer constants you have, the happier you are. This sounds backwards. But flexibility allows you to adapt to reality instead of demanding reality adapt to you, find unexpected joy in paths you didn't plan, build relationships with humans who are inherently unpredictable, and grow as life changes.
Rigidity is suffering. Flexibility is freedom.
You don't have to delete all your constants. Some are worth keeping — safety, core values, true deal-breakers. But you can loosen many of them from constants into strong preferences.
From "I must make $100k" to "I prefer financial security, and I'm open to discovering what that looks like in different forms." You're not giving up what you value. You're opening up how that value might be expressed.
A rigid constant protects your comfort. A healthy constant protects your integrity — it keeps you you when the world pressures you to become someone else.
Examples of healthy constants: "I won't stay in a relationship where I'm lied to repeatedly." "I won't sacrifice my health for a job." "I won't compromise my integrity for money or status." These are the bones of your character, not preferences dressed as constants.
The test: If loosening a constant would make you someone you don't recognise in the mirror, keep it tight. If loosening it would simply make you uncomfortable for a while but possibly open doors you didn't know existed, hold it more lightly.
This is one chapter of eight. The full book maps the geometry beneath every conversation you're struggling to finish.
Back the first editionLimited signed copies. Every tier includes early access before the book reaches Amazon.
The early reader
$10
For reading it first.
The first print
$30
A signed copy from Habeeb.
The hardback
$60
For keeping on the shelf.
The letter
$90
A handwritten note, written to you personally.
The room
$150
A seat at the live reading and launch.
Back the book before it's published.
Back the first edition